<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Department of Offense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.departmentofoffense.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.departmentofoffense.com</link>
	<description>Taking it Back!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 11:33:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on A Complete Moron by Pasqualeen</title>
		<link>http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2011/05/25/a-complete-moron/comment-page-1/#comment-2745</link>
		<dc:creator>Pasqualeen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 May 2011 11:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.departmentofoffense.com/?p=1220#comment-2745</guid>
		<description>Can this man find his own - zipper - without a teleprompter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can this man find his own &#8211; zipper &#8211; without a teleprompter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 1 in 5 ObamaCare waivers went to Nancy Pelosi’s by Cold, History, Insights, cold war history, delimitation, diplomatic history, guest login, political warfare, private agencies, shading, social psychology</title>
		<link>http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2011/05/17/1-in-5-obamacare-waivers-went-to-nancy-pelosi%e2%80%99s/comment-page-1/#comment-2743</link>
		<dc:creator>Cold, History, Insights, cold war history, delimitation, diplomatic history, guest login, political warfare, private agencies, shading, social psychology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 May 2011 19:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.departmentofoffense.com/?p=1196#comment-2743</guid>
		<description>[...] Yet it is precisely these kinds of difficulties that, according to Lucas, make studies of political warfare so potentially fruitful. In common with other students of Cold War history, Lucas argues that a scholarly division currently exists. On the one hand are those works which stress the conflict&#8217;s diplomatic, economic, military and political dimensions, typically privileging the state and emphasizing questions of geopolitics and national security (which he sees as the dominant complex of ‘diplomatic’ approaches). On the other are those studies which focus on such things as ethnicity, race, gender and the media in relation to the Cold War, works which for some critics attend less to agency or causation than context and discourse (in his view a marginalized, ‘cultural’ set of approaches developed in more recent years). By focusing on the ways in which during the 1940s and 1950s a public–private alliance came into being, motivated  Related to this you can read: http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2011/05/17/1-in-5-obamacare-waivers-went-to-nancy-pelosi%E2%80%99... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Yet it is precisely these kinds of difficulties that, according to Lucas, make studies of political warfare so potentially fruitful. In common with other students of Cold War history, Lucas argues that a scholarly division currently exists. On the one hand are those works which stress the conflict&#8217;s diplomatic, economic, military and political dimensions, typically privileging the state and emphasizing questions of geopolitics and national security (which he sees as the dominant complex of ‘diplomatic’ approaches). On the other are those studies which focus on such things as ethnicity, race, gender and the media in relation to the Cold War, works which for some critics attend less to agency or causation than context and discourse (in his view a marginalized, ‘cultural’ set of approaches developed in more recent years). By focusing on the ways in which during the 1940s and 1950s a public–private alliance came into being, motivated  Related to this you can read: <a href="http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2011/05/17/1-in-5-obamacare-waivers-went-to-nancy-pelosi%E2%80%99.." rel="nofollow">http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2011/05/17/1-in-5-obamacare-waivers-went-to-nancy-pelosi%E2%80%99..</a>. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Barack Obama Station: It&#8217;s All a Bad Act by Tweets that mention Department of Offense » The Barack Obama Station: It’s All a Bad Act -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2011/01/30/the-barack-obama-station-its-all-a-bad-act/comment-page-1/#comment-797</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Department of Offense » The Barack Obama Station: It’s All a Bad Act -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jan 2011 15:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.departmentofoffense.com/?p=1036#comment-797</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kate, Conservative Victory. Conservative Victory said: The Barack Obama Station: It’s All a Bad Act http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2011/01/30/the-barack-obama-station-its-all-a-bad-act/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kate, Conservative Victory. Conservative Victory said: The Barack Obama Station: It’s All a Bad Act <a href="http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2011/01/30/the-barack-obama-station-its-all-a-bad-act/" rel="nofollow">http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2011/01/30/the-barack-obama-station-its-all-a-bad-act/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to Make the Senate Vote on Full Obamacare Repeal by Tweets that mention Department of Offense » How to Make the Senate Vote on Full Obamacare Repeal -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2011/01/20/how-to-make-the-senate-vote-on-full-obamacare-repeal/comment-page-1/#comment-471</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Department of Offense » How to Make the Senate Vote on Full Obamacare Repeal -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Jan 2011 02:40:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.departmentofoffense.com/?p=1010#comment-471</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kate, Conservative Victory. Conservative Victory said: http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2011/01/20/how-to-make-the-senate-vote-on-full-obamacare-repeal/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Kate, Conservative Victory. Conservative Victory said: <a href="http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2011/01/20/how-to-make-the-senate-vote-on-full-obamacare-repeal/" rel="nofollow">http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2011/01/20/how-to-make-the-senate-vote-on-full-obamacare-repeal/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Government Strikes Back by federal employment benefits, defense intelligence agency &#124; will there be a nuclear war in 2011 ?</title>
		<link>http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2010/12/27/big-government-strikes-back/comment-page-1/#comment-379</link>
		<dc:creator>federal employment benefits, defense intelligence agency &#124; will there be a nuclear war in 2011 ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Dec 2010 19:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.departmentofoffense.com/?p=973#comment-379</guid>
		<description>[...] 20001 Washington, USA  You can also read the following related post: http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2010/12/27/big-government-strikes-back/ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 20001 Washington, USA  You can also read the following related post: <a href="http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2010/12/27/big-government-strikes-back/" rel="nofollow">http://www.departmentofoffense.com/2010/12/27/big-government-strikes-back/</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

